PUBLIC SYNTHETIC EVIDENCE REVIEW
Run the comparison. Inspect what changes.
Choose financial record review or industrial supply chain. Compare the supplied records, check the evidence, and see what changes when you add supporting material.
Run either domain without a key
The endpoint parses fixed key=value source records and computes their reference, period and quantity relationships. It does not retrieve external material or interpret arbitrary documents. Input selects a published packet, not a desired finding.
curl --fail-with-body 'https://developer.calamophyton.com/api/demo/v3/golden-thread?release=2026-09-05.1&domain=finance-dd&packet=initial&path=review-case&grant=reviewer'curl --fail-with-body 'https://developer.calamophyton.com/api/demo/v3/golden-thread?release=2026-09-05.1&domain=supply-chain&packet=requested-material&path=review-case&grant=reviewer'Add material—not a “resolved” flag
- Finance: match appendix reference, entity, period and version; recalculate 710 / 1,000 × 100 = 71%. Wrong-period or conflicting records leave the check open.
- Supply: compare dated stock, demand and receipts in the same item/site/unit. In requested-material, assuming the September 25 receipt, 500 opening units produce a minimum closing balance of 40. In low-stock, 200 opening units first produce a negative balance on September 12. The unreconciled transport date remains a separate question. aligned-transport reconciles that date in the same case; reviewable-shortfall reconciles it while retaining a known stock shortfall for human review.
- The reconciled packet is a separate complete reference case, not a resolution of the original incident. It has no outstanding defined evidence check. This is not an investment conclusion or supply-chain all-clear.
Keep the three responsibilities separate
The public implementation does not call private HARBINGER, PÓLYA or RAIFFA packages. Matching product names or contracts do not establish Core integration. Real product integration requires exact permitted package bytes, compatible runtime and a separately verified export boundary.
- HARBINGER surface: source-linked comparisons, changes and unresolved questions.
- PÓLYA surface: review paths marked available, waiting or not needed from the current evidence state. No recommendation or decision.
- RAIFFA surface: compare fixed synthetic role, scope, route, validity, revocation and used-ID records. These are real comparisons of mock records, not real credentials, approval or a durable replay ledger.
Verify the record independently
release=2026-09-05.1 pins source data and evaluator behavior. Hash the UTF-8 bytes of receipt.canonical with SHA-256 and compare receipt.digest. Also parse canonical and compare it with record. The complete record includes reasons, source fields and limits. Only meta.requestId and meta.servedAt are excluded.
The browser performs both checks before displaying a result. Hash equality proves neither truth nor authorization. Public links with run=1 repeat a GET; no personal history is stored. Old unversioned links open the retained v2 execution, not v3. Unsupported releases are rejected.
import { createHash } from 'node:crypto';
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
const origin = process.env.DEMO_ORIGIN ?? 'https://developer.calamophyton.com';
const http = await fetch(origin + '/api/demo/v3/golden-thread?release=2026-09-05.1&domain=finance-dd&packet=requested-material&path=review-case&grant=reviewer');
assert.equal(http.status, 200);
const response = await http.json();
assert.equal(createHash('sha256').update(response.receipt.canonical, 'utf8').digest('hex'), response.receipt.digest);
assert.deepEqual(JSON.parse(response.receipt.canonical), response.record);
console.log({ digest: response.receipt.digest, authority: response.record.authority.issuedAuthority });
Understand the assumptions and measure the real work
Supply calculations use calendar days, constant daily demand, fully usable stock and receipts available at the start of the stated date. Safety stock, reservations and inspection delays are not modelled. Roles and review routes are illustrative, not practitioner-validated operating policy.
Compare identical review tasks with and without assistance: source preparation, review and correction time; critical omissions; false alarms; and rework. Counts of checks are not measured hours saved. No customer performance claim is made.