Find the gap. See what closes it.
Compare synthetic example records, inspect the finding, then run the review again with supporting material.
Scope, assumptions, and measurement
This fixed example uses precomputed synthetic responses to compare references and quantities, show review paths, and display fixed identity checks. These public demo evaluators do not currently call the private HARBINGER, PÓLYA or RAIFFA Core packages.
Supply calculations assume calendar days, constant daily demand, fully usable stock and receipts available at the start of the stated day. Safety stock, reservations and inspection delays are not modelled. Roles and review routes require practitioner validation.
Measure the same review task with and without assistance: preparation + review + corrections, critical gaps missed, false alarms and rework. No customer time savings have been measured here.
No login, customer input, file transfer, browser persistence, external AI call, real approval or external execution. Hosting logs and browser URL history are separate from application case storage.
Discuss an evaluation of your review workflow →